Before you let AI shape your opinion, see how other AIs answer.
Ask a single chatbot about a war, your rights, religion, or a controversial policy, and you receive one confident answer without seeing its assumptions. TILT asks leading AIs the same question and exposes their differences side by side, so you can see the framing before it shapes your judgment.
Three foundation models answered this exact question under identical inference settings (temperature=0.3). Click any stance label or model marker to inspect the exact supporting passage.
Note: These labels describe these particular responses; they do not claim to reveal permanent model beliefs.
Classified by Strands Decider 2B · Calibrated threshold ≥ 0.25
DeepSeek argues for an outright ban to reclaim classrooms as distraction-free learning spaces, while Claude advocates for nuanced restrictions (phone-free during instruction, permitted during breaks) that preserve educational and emergency uses. Llama occupies middle ground, endorsing bans during class hours specifically rather than school-wide prohibition.
Acknowledges smartphone harms but rejects outright bans in favor of context-specific restrictions balancing learning and legitimate device utility.
“A more nuanced approach might work better: restricting phone use during instructional time and allowing it during breaks, or implementing "phone-free zones" in classrooms while permitting controlled use elsewhere.”
Supports class-hour bans to minimize distraction and improve engagement while implicitly permitting phones outside instructional periods.
“Schools should consider banning smartphones during class hours.”
Advocates comprehensive school-day bans as necessary to restore focused learning and face-to-face interaction as core educational values.
“Schools should implement a ban on smartphones during the school day.”